ISic003581: Monumental fragment reading M·PA
- ID
- ISic003581
- Language
- Latin
- Text type
- building
- Object type
- plaque
- Status
- No data
- Links
- View in current site
Edition
Apparatus criticus
- Text from autopsy
Physical description
Support
- Description
- Two joining fragments of an off-white marble, in differing states of preservation. Height 28.5-29 cm; width (max) 27.5 cm; depth 3.5 cm (top) to 4 cm (base). Fragment 1 (upper) preserves the upper margin of the stone, fragment 2 (lower) preserves the lower margin, although in both cases the edges are rough and weathered. Both fragments are broken to left and right.
- Object type
- plaque
- Material
- marble
- Condition
- No data
- Dimensions
- height: 28.5-29 cm, width: 27.5 cm, depth: 3.5-4.0 cm
Inscription
- Layout
- A single line of monumental letters is preserved across the face
- Text condition
- No data
- Lettering
-
- Letter heights
- Line 1: 155mm
- Interlinear heights
- Interlineation line 1 to 2: N/Amm
Provenance
- Place of origin
- Halaesa
- Provenance found
- Excavated in 1971, in room 7 of the west portico of the agora
- Map
Current location
- Place
- Halaesa, Italy
- Repository
- Antiquarium e sito archeologico di Halaesa , 30590
- Autopsy
- On display in the lapidarium on site
- Map
Date
1st — 2nd century CE (AD 1 – AD 200)- Evidence
- lettering
Text type
commentary
The first visible stroke on the stone is a slanting one, which makes clear that the first letter is an M. Only a single serif is visible upper right for the final letter, but such a downward sloping serif, vertically overlapping with the right hasta of the A preceding, cannot realistically belong to anything other than the left end of the cross bar of a letter T. Pat[---] could be part of patronus, pater, or patria all of which are plausible in the context of a monumental (building) inscription. Without this trace it would be tempting to read Pa[ccius] and a reference to a member of the family mentioned in ISic003572 and (possibly) ISic003573 and the Augustan coinage (RPC I, no.630-631, 633).
Scibona proposed to treat this pair of fragments as part of the same text as ISic003580 (the basilica fragment). The type of stone is very similar and the letters are of almost identical height and broadly similar form. However, the form and depth of the upper terminations of the letters M and A, the overall depth of the letters, the presence of red paint, and the differing profile of the stone (slightly taller, and thicker in its lower half) all challenge a direct association, even if the broad context and epigraphic type looks very similar.
The text is likely to belong to the first or second century AD.
Bibliography
- Digital editions
- TM: 645652
- EDR: -
- EDH: -
- EDCS: -
- PHI: -
- Printed editions
Citation and editorial status
- Editor
- Jonathan Prag
- Principal contributor
- Jonathan Prag
- Contributors
- Jonathan Prag
- James Cummings
- James Chartrand
- Valeria Vitale
- Michael Metcalfe
- system
- Simona Stoyanova
- Last revision
- 1/19/2021