ISic003582: Monumental fragment reading NSVM
- ID
- ISic003582
- Language
- Latin
- Text type
- building
- Object type
- plaque
- Status
- No data
- Links
- View in current site
Edition
Apparatus criticus
- Text from autopsy
Physical description
Support
- Description
- Two joining fragments of thin coarse yellow-white marble. Height 28-28.3 cm; width (max) 27 cm; depth 2cm (top) to 2.8 cm (base, excluding moulding). The upper and lower margins are intact on both fragments; both are broken to left and right. A simple raised moulding (damaged) survives along the lower edge of both fragments.
- Object type
- plaque
- Material
- marble
- Condition
- No data
- Dimensions
- height: 28-28.3 cm, width: 27 cm, depth: 2-2.8 cm
Inscription
- Layout
- A single line of large Latin letters is preserved on the face
- Text condition
- No data
- Lettering
-
- Letter heights
- Line 1: 155-165mm
- Interlinear heights
- Interlineation line 1 to 2: N/Amm
Provenance
- Place of origin
- Halaesa
- Provenance found
- Excavated in 1971, in room 7 of the west portico of the agora
- Map
Current location
- Place
- Halaesa, Italy
- Repository
- Antiquarium e sito archeologico di Halaesa , 30592
- Autopsy
- On display in the lapidarium on site
- Map
Date
1st — 2nd century CE (AD 1 – AD 200)- Evidence
- lettering
Text type
commentary
The break on the left follows the line of a slanting stroke, and the fact that the M later in the text has an initial sloping hasta demonstrates that this must be N, not M. The stroke visible just above the letter at the left margin is later damage and not a letter stroke. The final stroke of the M is lost. The most likely possibilities for this combination of letters in such a monumental text are consummare (common in describing completion of an undertaking or building) and consumere (common in describing a building damaged / destroyed and now replaced / rebuilt); mensum and censum might also be possible.
The text belongs to the first, second, or earlier third century AD.
The fragments have some similarity to ISic003580 and ISic003581, but they should be treated separately for a number of reasons: the letter forms are distinct in their style (narrower, shallower, with finer serifs, and rounded at the junction of two upright strokes, as in V and M, which is also off-vertical here but vertical in the other two), the type of stone is not identical, and the form of the stone is different in both thickness and the moulding at the lower edge.
Bibliography
- Digital editions
- TM: 645653
- EDR: -
- EDH: -
- EDCS: -
- PHI: -
- Printed editions
Citation and editorial status
- Editor
- Jonathan Prag
- Principal contributor
- Jonathan Prag
- Contributors
- Jonathan Prag
- James Cummings
- James Chartrand
- Valeria Vitale
- Michael Metcalfe
- system
- Simona Stoyanova
- Last revision
- 1/19/2021