ISic000099: Funerary inscription for Gaius Popillius Priscus

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana, photo J.Prag 08.07.2022
ID
ISic000099
Language
Latin
Text type
funerary
Object type
stele
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text from autopsy (Antoniou) ;
  • 4: There are traces of a very faint horizontal bar at the bottom of the first letter after Victoria. By comparison with the T in Turrania on line 7, I prefer reading Liciniana rather than Ticiniana, contra Bivona (1978; 1994). Contra Bivona (1994), but I read 'MILTAVIT' on stone, rather than 'MIITAVIT'. The first 'I' in MILTAVIT is difficult to read: the slight curve on the letter suggests it is an 's', especially in comparison with 's' elsewhere on stone, but difficult to find an alternative reading.
  • 5: Contra Bivona (1994), but there is evidence of a supralinear line over VI

Physical description

Support

Description
Stele with tapered sides and rounded top, although with a straight break across the top left which obscures the beginning of the first line. Sides abraded. The epigraphic field has been chiselled back from the surface on the upper half of the front face, ending roughly half-way down stone, with an almost horizontal division between the chiselled and non-chiselled portions. Rear is extremely flat.
Object type
stele
Material
limestone
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 109 cmwidth: 48 (at bottom), 54 (at top) cmdepth: 11.5 cm

Inscription

Layout
Eight lines of Latin text, in centre (but not centred) of stone. Use of triangular interpuncts, although some are faint and indistinct. Interpuncts are not used between every word. Line 1 is notably larger, line 2 reduces, the other lines much smaller.
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Line 1: 52-56 (diminutive E at end of line, 35)mm
Line 2: 39-45mm
Line 3: 29-35mm
Line 4: 27-34mm
Line 5: 27-32 (supralinear line on VI, 41)mm
Line 6: 25-29mm
Line 7: 24-36mm
Line 8: 25-32mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Thermae Himeraeae
Provenance found
Found in December 1950 in Termini Imerese, 'on the right of the Barratina stream [...] in the excavations for the foundation of a mill'. Quoted from Bivona 1994, who quotes a letter dated to the 20th of December 1950 from the Honourable Inspector, Professor G. Navarra to the Soprintendenza alle Antichità for the province of Palermo and Trapani. The stele went subsequently sent to the Museum.

Current location

Place
Termini Imerese, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico Baldassare Romano , 119
Autopsy
Antoniou, 2022-07-13. On display in the courtyard portico of Museo Civico Baldassare Romano
Map

Date

The dating is contested by Bivona (later C1 CE, post-69) and Manganaro (a date shortly after 310-313 CE), based upon the reading of the word after 'Victoria' in line 4 (Bivona prefers Ticiniana, Manganaro Licininia). The other features of the text would seem to favour a later first rather than a fourth-century date. (AD 69 – AD 100)
Evidence
textual-context

Text type

funerary

commentary

While there is another Popillius attested in Thermae Himeraeae ISic00117, that Popillius likely belongs to the Pollia tribe, and thus there is likely no connection between the two individuals. For Turrania, there is only one other attestion of the name in Sicily, in its masculine form, from Halaesa ISic003576, but is extremely common elsewhere in the empire. Although there is some uncertainty, given the condition of the front face of the inscription, it appears that line 4 reads 'victoria Liciniana' (following the reading of Manganaro (1989)), who subsequently dated the inscription to a victoria Liciniana of Licinius, either in 310 or 313 CE, either in Raetia or at Campus Egrenus in Thrace. As Ricci (C. Ricci, "In Custodiam Urbis: Notes on the Cohortes Urbanae (1968-2010)", Historia 60.4 (2011), 484–508, at 503) emphasises, however, the complete onomastic formula with tribal affiliation attested in an inscription for a miles urbanicianus makes a fourth-century CE date for this inscription 'difficult to justify', although Bivona (1994) is less certain of this as an absolute requirement. Ricci (2011) and Bivona (1978; 1994) prefer then to read victoria Ticiniana, and date the inscription on the basis of a battle between the armies of Vitellius and Otho in March/April of 69 CE, to match the testimony of Tacitus (Histories, 1.87.1, 1.89.1, 2.21.4, 2.17.2), who attests to the involvement of urban cohorts at the time. Bivona (1994) considers the questions of this inscription to be a continuing problem, and is not entirely happy with the solution she proposed.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
6/10/2025