ISic000366: Epitaph of Caius Pompeius Felix and Scribonia Restituta

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana; photo J. Prag 13.05.2016
ID
ISic000366
Language
Latin
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text based upon photograph, after Korhonen

Physical description

Support

Description
Two non-joining fragments of a marble plaque. Fragment (a) from the left half of the plaque is intact along the upper edge, but broken on the other three sides (H 11cm, W 11cm, D 2.3cm); fragment (b) preserves the right half of the plaque, intact top, right and below, but broken on the left side (H 14cm, W 22cm, D 2.3cm). A simple relief moulding is preserved across the top of the plaque. The rear of the plaque is rough and uneven. Fragment (b) has been heavily repainted with a brown paint. The surface of fragment (a) is less well preserved, but the letters retain traces of a bright red paint.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 14 cm, width: greater than 33 cm, depth: 2.3 cm

Inscription

Layout
Three lines of Latin letters, decreasing in height, and seemingly centred on the plaque.
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Line 1: 18-29mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Found in the property of Vincenzo Paterno, relative of the Prince of Biscari, from where it entered his collection, prior to 1740.

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania , 639
Autopsy
sala VII.283
Map

Date

1st century CE (Korhonen, by lettering and (lack of) formula) (AD 1 – AD 100)
Evidence
lettering, textual-context

Text type

funerary

commentary

Given that both names reflect senatorial families attested in the area, this is assumed to be a freedman and freedwoman of the families. Korhonen notes the absence of 'Dis Manibus' as encouraging a first-century date, alongside the palaeography. Castelli and Ferrara report the right fragment only as a separate text, in addition to reporting the entire text, following a notice in Amico.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
1/17/2024