ISic000616: A Roman honours his mother

Photo J. Prag, courtesy Museo Regionale Archeologico Pietro Griffo
ID
ISic000616
Language
Latin
Text type
honorific
Object type
block
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text from autopsy;
  • line.2: [devo]TE, De Miro 2000; the first letter preserves part of an upper horizontal, the second is either an E or an F

Physical description

Support

Description
A large rectangular block of shell-bearing limestone, intact on top, left, right and behind, but damaged below. Appears intact lower right underside, so the only significant loss/damage is the lower left corner. The left edge of the stone is clearly preserved, which implies at least one additional block originally stood to the left.
Object type
block
Material
No data
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 36.5 cm, width: 139.5 cm, depth: 20.5 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Letter heights
Line 1: 90-105mm
Line 2: 85-95mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: 30-45mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Agrigentum
Provenance found
Found in 1925 in material to the east of the 'Oratory of Phalaris' (Marconi writes "ritrovata tra le macerie a oriente del tempietto")
Map

Current location

Place
Agrigento, Italy
Repository
Museo Regionale Archeologico Pietro Griffo , S.2319
Autopsy
On display.
Map

Date

Republican (letter forms), perhaps 125—75 BCE (125 BC – 75 BC)
Evidence
No data

Text type

honorific

commentary

The surviving traces at the start of line two are most readily compatible in the context with TF, which would be T(iberi) f(iliam) as the filiation of the honoured mother's name. The suggestion of De Miro to read devote is less plausible. De Miro's suggestion to read ter pius as 'thrice pius' rather than tribal and cognomen/epithet cannot be followed. The first part of the text continued on another block to the left. The interpunct after 'suam' in line 2 and the edge of the stone suggest this is the right hand end of the text. The layout could imply another line below on another block, perhaps containing the explanation for the honours. It has been generally assumed that the stone belongs to the so-called 'Oratory of Phalaris', which in turn was suggested by the excavator Marconi (1926) to be a heroon. The idea that it was a tomb or heroon, rather than a temple was firmly rejected by Wilson (1990: 31 and 356 n.102). Campagna (2007) has however rightly questioned whether there is in fact any evidence for the association. The block is the same stone as the temple; it does however show no traces of the stucco which covers much of the exterior of the temple. The formulation of nominative individual and then accusative for the mother makes it more likely that this is an honorific (perhaps a statue base?) rather than a funerary inscription, albeit using the Greek accusative for the honorand (Latin would ordinarily use a dative) - this latter feature could either imply a Roman / Italian immigrant to the island or else a 'romanised' Sicilian. Honours of this sort for a woman in Latin epigraphy at this date are rare.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
1/19/2021