ISic001076: Decree in honour of a gymnasiarch

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana; photo M. Metcalfe, 2016-09-27.
ID
ISic001076
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
decree
Object type
stele
Status
draft
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • text of Feyel 1935 controlled against photographs and corrected (principally the restoration of some letters which Feyel considered lost, but which were read by previous scholars in the 18th or 19th century);
  • 2: Feyel: Ἱστατίου; Dubois: Ἱστ[ια]ίου; but the upper part of quadrate epsilon is clear, meaning only Ἱστιείου is possible, as already LGPN IIIA.
  • 29: Notwithstanding the suggestions of Wilhelm and the objections of Dubois, the stone clearly reads: ΚΑΤΑΝΟΓΡΑΦΗΣΗΙ

Physical description

Support

Description
A slim stele, described as ‘marbre gris’ by Feyel (1935: 372) and as ‘pietra dura grigiastra’ by Carità (1978: 10), but seemingly a soft sedimentary calcareous stone, surmounted by a triangular tympanon (c.0.2m tall) with simple acroteria on the left (broken off) and right corners.
Object type
stele
Material
limestone
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 120 cmwidth: 30 cmdepth: cm

Inscription

Layout
The text, occupying 47 lines, fills the upper two-thirds of the main rectangular portion of the stele.,[object Object]
Text condition
No data
Technique
chiselled
Pigment
No data
Lettering

The lettering is tight, both in between letters and in interlinear spaces. The first two lines are larger and more spaced, though not necessarily more precise in execution. Alpha appears with both a straight and a curved crossbar. Interchangeable use of four-bar and lunate sigma, often in the same line, often close together. Interchangeable use of square and lunate epsilon, same variability and position as with sigma. There is occasional omission of the middle bar of a lunate epsilon, particularly in between two sigmas, resulting visually in the combination CCC. This occurs both at the beginning and end of lines, and does not seem to correspond to textual cues. Omega is mostly rhomboid or ovoid, occasionally round, though the few round instances seem to be an execution issue with the ovoid variant rather than a stylistic choice.

Letter heights
Line 1-3: 15-20mm
Line 4-47: 10mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Phintias
Provenance found
Found by two members of the Spanish garrison at the fort of Sant'Angelo, 13 April 1660, where it was first preserved.
Map

Current location

Place
Licata, Italy
Repository
Museo Archeologico della Badia
Autopsy
None

Date

(Later) second or first century BCE (Dubois and Cordiano suggest 1st cent. BCE) (200 BC - 51 BC)
Evidence
lettering

Text type

decree

commentary

The text has a curious history, in so far as it was discovered in 1660, and has been on display in church, townhall, or museum, in Licata almost ever since. The published editions of Castelli, Principe di Torremuzza, Franz in CIG, and Kaibel in IG XIV all appear to be based upon comparison of transcriptions which they had been sent, or earlier editions likewise based upon transcriptions (the principal transcriptions are preserved in the manuscripts of D'Orville, in the Bodleian Library). The only modern edition that is based upon autopsy is that of Feyel 1935 (that of Cordiano is based upon Dubois, and it appears that Dubois' text is in turn based upon Feyel). Manganaro appears from his comments to have seen the stone, but never to have published a formal edition, only observations and minor emendations. Manganaro published a black and white photograph (1990 tav. LXXXIII), but this is insufficient to check readings. The stone is currently on display in the Licata museum, having previously been walled into a municipal building. Adamesteanu argued that the text was an antiquarian fake, but many of his concerns (about palaeography and onomastics) appear unfounded, and 1660 is rather too early for the 18th century Sicilian antiquarian and civic competition that led to the production of a number of invented inscriptions on the island in the later 18th and early 19th centuries (the text is also, arguably, much too complex for such a forgery, especially at such an early date). The text currently presented here is an initial control of Feyel's text, based upon the photos here presented. Proper autopsy remains to be carried out.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
11/12/2024