ISic001207: Epitaph for Nemeris, a goldsmith

Photo J. Prag, courtesy Museo Archeologico Regionale Antonino Salinas
ID
ISic001207
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
stele
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text after earlier editions and photograph;
  • line.1: Salinas, Νεμέρις; Kaibel, Νεμέρις or Νεμέρι[ε]
  • line.3: Salinas, Νυμφόδωρι

Physical description

Support

Description
A rectangular sandstone cippus, intact and finished on all sides, but uneven below; minor damage to the upper left of the front face
Object type
stele
Material
sandstone
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 40 cmwidth: 31 cmdepth: 14.5 cm

Inscription

Layout
Five lines of Greek letters, centred on the stone
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Lines 1-5: 30-45mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Abacaenum
Provenance found
From the area of the necropolis in contrada Cardusa
Map

Current location

Place
Palermo, Italy
Repository
Museo Archeologico Regionale Antonino Salinas , 8706
Autopsy
Palermo Museum, July 2017
Map

Date

2nd century BCE(?) (200 BC – 100 BC)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

The reading of line 1 is problematic; traces of a letter seem to be visible after the final iota, but whether a sigma or a faint epsilon very uncertain. Manni Piraino rejected the presence of a letter and argued for a vocative in -i from forms (common in Sicily) in -is; on the other hand, the vocative Νεμέριε from the well attested Greek rendering Νεμέριος is straightforward. A Numerius Granonius, N.f. Cat(ulus?), domo Luceria, who served in Roman legions of the mid-C1 BC is known from an Athenian inscription (CIL 1 (2).791). Manni Piraino (in IGPalermo) dates this inscription to the C2 AD, apparently on the basis of the nomenclature and assumptions about the letter forms. The principal area of the necropolis, however, is archaeologically Hellenistic (and not later than the early C2 BC), and only a single inscription from the general area of Tripi (the Latin fragment, ISic 0623) is certainly from the imperial period. There is nothing about the letter forms themselves which requires an imperial date (closed omega with variable forms is common in the later Hellenistic, and the absence of any lunate forms is notable), so the argument appears to rest on historical assumptions regarding the Italic/Roman elements in the name, which do not follow proper Roman conventions regarding e.g. filiation, and employ Sicilian Greek orthography. In other words, an earlier, rather than a later date seems more plausible, of the second century BC?

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
1/19/2021