ISic001387: Fragmentary Greek inscription (funerary?)

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic001387
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
unknown
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text derived from Torremuzza 1769;
  • line.3: Torremuzza gives no indication that anything is missing after the sigma

Physical description

Support

Description
Neither the material nor the form of this inscription is recorded.
Object type
unknown
Material
stone
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: cmwidth: cmdepth: cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Adranon
Provenance found
Reported at second-hand by Torremuzza (1769), who was sent the text by Nicolaus Capretti.

Current location

Lost.

Date

A date in the period 4th — 1st century BCE seems most likely, but it is impossible to be certain in the absence of further information (400 BC – 1 BC)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

The stone is probably a funerary inscription. Franz (CIG III, 5737) proposed expanding the text as Ἀρχε[λαΐδ]ας Πολυσ[τράτου] or Πολυσ[θένευς] (i.e. “(tombstone) of Archelaidas, son of Polystratos/Polysthenes”). However, the name Ἀρχελαΐδας is not attested for Sicily, and the alternatives in Ἀρχε- known for the island mostly do not end in –ας (Ἀρχέδαμος is common; Ἀρχεθάλης, Ἀρχέλας, Ἀρχέστρατος, Ἀρχέτιμος, Ἀρχέτιος are all found). Πολύστρατος is attested once on Sicily, Πολυσθένης is rare and not known in western Greece/Sicily. Torremuzza does not indicate anything was missing after the final letter, and the rare name Πόλυς is attested in Sicily, on a vase inscription from Gela of the fifth century BC (Dubois, IGDS 142 c; = Arena, Iscr. Sic. II 23), although one would then expect Πολυος for the genitive patronymic.

It is impossible to date this text, in the absence of further information, although it is most likely to belong to the Hellenistic period.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
2/17/2022