ISic003290: Epitaph for Priska(?)

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic003290
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
draft
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text based on photograph;
  • line.1: Ferrua, Noy: [---]ις κα[---]; Korhonen: [Πρ]ῖσκα
  • line.2: Libertini, Korhonen: [ἔζ]ησεν; Ferrua, Noy: [---]ης εν[---]
  • line.3: Liberini, Noy: δέκ[α]; Ferrua [---]ηδε κ[---]; Korhonen: [ἔτ]η δέκ[α]
  • line.4: Ferrua: ἐτω(ν); Korhonen: [ἐν Χρισ]τῷ (the space between τω and the previous letter could be justified if we suppose an abbreviation: ἐν Χρ(ισ)τῷ); Chaniotis: [μήνας ὀκ]τώ;
  • Ferrua, Noy and Korhonen 2001 interpreted the symbol as a menorah, but later Korhonen as a palm

Physical description

Support

Description
Marble plaque damaged on the left and on the right, set in plaster in modern times.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Object condition
damaged
Dimensions
height: 19.5 cmwidth: 13 cmdepth: 1-5 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Technique
chiselled
Pigment
No data
Lettering

A with broken bar, Δ with serif, lunate Ε and Σ, cursive Ω.

Letter heights
Lines 1-4: 18-30mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not recordedmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Original discovery not recorded, according to Korhonen and Noy from Catania.

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania , 310
Autopsy
Observed by Libertini in Museo Biscari, later by Korhonen in Magazzino del cortile, Collezione Biscari (formerly sala VII 288)
Map

Date

4th century CE (AD 301 - AD 400)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

The epitaph is Jewish, as revealed by the symbol of a menorah. Korhonen rejects the Judaic provenance of the inscription believing the symbol to be a palm, but the feet of the menorah seems to be present even if not rubricated. Korhonen’s supplement to l. 4 ἐν Χρ(ισ)τῷ (the same abbreviation as in RQUA 10 (1896) 38 nr. 67), for this reason, cannot be supported: moreover, the space does not seem sufficient. If one assumes that a few characters are missing on the right, the integration of Chaniotis (ap. SEG) [μήνας ὀκ]τώ is also not possible. One possibility would be to integrate the numeral δεκαοκτώ. For the name Prisca in another Latin inscription from Catania from the imperial period, see CIL 10.1088*199 = ISic003241.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
12/22/2022