ISic004389: terminus marker?

Photo J. Prag, Aut. Assessorato Beni Culturali Regione Siciliana n.10681 del 06/05/2014
ID
ISic004389
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
terminus
Object type
block
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text from autopsy

Physical description

Support

Description
A block of yellow-orange local calcareous stone ('tufo arenaria'), intact left and below, but seemingly broken on top and on the right. Roughly finished on the reverse.
Object type
block
Material
limestone
Condition
damaged
Dimensions
height: 33 cmwidth: 48 cmdepth: 10 cm

Inscription

Layout
Two lines of Greek text, with a deep horizontal line above each (same depth as the letters). Although the stone is broken top and right, there is no clear evidence that the text continued beyond what is preserved (the surface is preserved beyond the text, and the 'guidelines' also stop with the preserved text. A cross precedes line 1.
Text condition
complete
Lettering

Letter heights
Line 1: 70-75mm
Line 2: 60-70mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: 20-30mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Megara Hyblaea
Provenance found
Part of the initial museum collection, without date of acquisition, noted by Orsi (Taccuino 1, p.78) as from Cantera, i.e. Megara Hyblaea
Map

Current location

Place
Siracusa, Italy
Repository
Museo Archeologico Regionale Paolo Orsi , 223
Autopsy
Currently in the small store room behind the medagliere of the museum

Date

4th - 7th century CE (AD 300 – AD 700)
Evidence
lettering

Text type

terminus

commentary

This stone is a second example of a text known and published from Megara Hyblaea, found in 1965 and published by Manni Piraino in 1975 (ISic003698). This example, although clearly found before 1888, as it was on display in the 'sala cristiana' of the original museum in Siracusa, and noted by Orsi in his first 'taccuino', was first published here and in Prag 2021 (noted in Tréziny 2018: 275 n.11, where J. Craig should read J. Prag). Its interpretation remains uncertain, but given the existence of two such stones, some form of property or boundary marker, perhaps in relation to church land, seems most likely.

Bibliography

Digital editions
  • TM: -
  • EDR: -
  • EDH: -
  • EDCS: -
  • PHI: -
Printed editions
Discussion

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
10/13/2022