ISic000992: Epitaph of Syrakosios

Photo Museo Arch. Reg. P. Orsi (2012), Aut. Assessorato Beni Culturali Regione Siciliana n.10681 del 06/05/2014
ID
ISic000992
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
edited
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text from photograph ;
  • line.1: Orsi: ΕΙΠ
  • line.5: Kaibel (after Mommsen): ΑΒΟΥΙ (sic); Agnello: ΑΒΟΥ(Ν)Δ
  • line.6: Orsi: ANTIAE

Physical description

Support

Description
A grey marble plaque, intact (but lightly chipped) on all sides, but very irregular on left, right and below, only have a straight edge across the top.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
complete
Dimensions
height: 18 cmwidth: 19 cmdepth: cm

Inscription

Layout
Six lines of text, of which the first four are neatly and regularly set out between guidelines, but the final two are squeezed into the remaining space, centred but unevenly and without guidelines.
Text condition
complete #text_condition, legible
Technique
chiselled
Pigment
No data
Lettering

Clear V-cut letters without serifs of somewhat uneven width, consistent height over the first four lines, more irregular thereafter. Alpha with broken bar and stroke rising off the apex; Beta with closed but separated eyes; delta with stroke rising off the apex; epsilon lunate in line 1 but regular in line 2; theta ovoid with full straight cross-bar; kappa has full length arms; mu has vertical first and last, and short middle strokes; omicron varies in size and from round to ovoid; pi is equal length with overlapping horizontal; rho has small closed eye; sigma is lunate, but rectilinear; omega is lunate and small above the line.

Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Syracusae
Provenance found
Among material excavated by Cavalleri in the
Map

Current location

Place
Siracusa, Italy
Repository
Museo Archeologico Regionale Paolo Orsi , 110
Autopsy
None
Map

Date

later 3rd - 5th century CE (AD 251 - AD 500)
Evidence
archaeological-context

Text type

funerary

commentary

Carini published the editio princeps of this text, and is in fact the only editor to read it completely accurately. Kaibel followed a transcription of Mommsen, who failed to read the small delta at the end of line 5, while Orsi was misled by the damage to the final sigma on line 6 and struggled to resolve the initial vertical strokes of line 1. Agnello appears to have followed Kaibel's text and assumed that the vertical at the end of line 5 was part of a nu, to be suppressed.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
6/29/2021