ISic001273: Dedication to Aphrodite

No image available

ID
ISic001273
Status
draft
Language
Ancient Greek
Object type
unknown
Text type
dedication

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • line.1: [ἐπὶ ἱερείας τᾶς Ἀφ]ροδίτας Manganaro; ἱερατεύσας θεᾶς Ἀφρ]οδίτας Franz (ap. CIG III 5652); ἱερατεύσασαν τᾶς Ἀφρ]οδίτας Kaibel (ap. IG XIV 448)
  • line.2: [τᾶς δεῖνος τᾶς Νικο(?)]στράτου Manganaro; τῆς δεῖνος τῆς τοῦ ---]στράτου Franz (ap. CIG III 5652); τᾶς δεῖνος τῆς τοῦ ---]στράτου Kaibel (ap. IG XIV 448)
  • line.3: [ὁ δεῖνα τοῦ δεῖνος, Ἀρχεβ(?)]ούλα Manganaro; ἡ δεῖνα Ἀρχεβ]οῦλα Franz (ap. CIG III 5652); ἀνέθεκεν ἁ β]οῦλα Kaibel (ap. IG XIV 448), Hoffmann
  • line.4: [ἡ δεῖνα — — — Ἀφρο]δίται Manganaro; ἡ δεῖνα θεᾷ Ἀφρο]δίτᾳ Franz (ap. CIG III 5652); ὁ δᾶμος καὶ Ἀφρο]δίται Kaibel (ap. IG XIV 448), Hoffmann

Physical description

Support

Description
No data
Object type
unknown
Object condition
No data
Dimensions
height: cmwidth: cmdepth: cm

Material

Description
volcanic stone
Type > subtype
inorganic.stone > unverified

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Technique
chiselled
Pigment
No data
Lettering
No data
Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Found in 1703 in a church of Motta S. Anastasia (part of chora of Katania)

Current location

Lost.

Date

4th — 2nd century BCE (Korhonen 2003, p. 70) (400 BCE - 101 BCE)
Evidence
No data

Text type

dedication

commentary

This dedicatory inscription was made to Aphrodite, perhaps by three individuals, of whom the only partially preserved name is Archeboula (the name also appears in an inscription of the imperial period from Thermae Himeraeae: Kokalos 20 (1974), no. 17 (ISic001139)). According to Kaibel’s restoration (ap. IG XIV 448), the dedication would have been made by the Catanean boule and demos, however, in the absence of parallels for public dedications made by the Catanean civic institutions, Manganaro’s interpretation, according to which the dedication was made by private individuals, appears preferable. The cult of Aphrodite at Catania is attested by literary sources (the Pervigilium Veneris, which describes festivities that could be associated with the Catanean chora), numismatic evidence (some bronze coins from the Catanean territory dating between the 2nd and 1st centuries BC depicting the Goddess on the recto holding a dove), and epigraphic evidence, such as the dedication CIL X 2, 7013 (ISic000297), discovered near Motta S. Anastasia, in the Catanean chora, which mentions the cult of Venus Venetrix at Hybla Gereatis, a kome of Catania. The dating of the inscription is indicated in the first two lines by the mention of the priestess of Aphrodite, whose patronymic, Νικο]στράτου, was cautiously proposed by Manganaro (1994, 165 n. 115), a name rather widespread in imperial-period Sicily (cf. LGPN IIIA p. 327).

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions
Discussion

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
8/3/2026