ISic001310: Fragment of an epitaph

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic001310
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text based on photograph;
  • line.1: lapis ΚΩΜΩ; Kaibel: ΚΩΜΥ (e.g. Κώμυλος); Korhonen: Κωμω[---] (e.g. Κώμων or Κωμῳδίων)
  • lines.1-2: Kaibel, Korhonen: [πα]|τρὶ
  • line.2: Korhonen: Τολο[---] (e.g. (Π)Τολομαῖος)
  • line.3: Kaibel, Korhonen: Ἀκτιακὴ [--- ἔζησεν]; lapis: ΑΚΤΙΑΚΑ[---]
  • line.4: Kaibel, Korhonen: ἐξή[κοντα]

Physical description

Support

Description
Fragment of a white marble plaque, intact on the top and on the left, damaged on the right and below.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
fragment
Dimensions
height: 11 cmwidth: 10.5 cmdepth: 2 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
incomplete
Lettering

Letter heights
Lines 1-4: 12-16mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not registeredmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Original discovery not recorded; probably from Catania.

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania ,
Autopsy
Observed by Kaibel in Museo Biscari, later by Korhonen in magazzino superiore, Collezione Biscari.
Map

Date

1st century CE or first half of 2nd century CE (AD 1 – AD 150)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

Although the text is fragmentary, it is possible to assume that the epitaph consisted of two main sentences, the first with the name of the deceased in dative followed by the dedicants in the nominative form (for lack of space, as Korhonen [2004: 200] observes, the verb ἐποίησαν may have been omitted), the second with the indication of the age of the deceased. According to Korhonen, the deceased was Κωμω[---] πατήρ: it must be pointed out that the indication of the fatherhood is found especially when the father is the dedicant and the son the deceased (see IG 14.476 = ISic001299). The name of the second dedicant was Ἀκτιακά (NB, contra Kaibel and Korhonen, final A is clearly visible, not Η, even though the name is not attested in this form), whereas the first dedicant was probably Τολομαῖος: for this form due to the influence of the Latin Tolomaeus, see Solin (1982: 231-232).

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions
Discussion

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
1/9/2023