ISic001335: Epitaph

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic001335
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text based on photographs;
  • line.1: Kirchhoff: ἐ]ποίησ[αν; Korhonen: ἐ]ποίησ[ε
  • line.2: Kirchhoff: ε]ὐσεβ[εῖς; Kaibel: ἐ]υσεβ[εστατ---

Physical description

Support

Description
Lower fragment of marble plaque, broken to left, above and right, set in plaster in modern times.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
fragment
Dimensions
height: 14.5 cmwidth: 12.5 cmdepth: 1-5 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Lines 1-3: 17-20mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not recordedmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Original discovery not recorded, probably Catania.

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania , 279
Autopsy
Observed by Amico in Museo dei Benedettini, later by Korhonen in magazzino del cortile, Collezione dei Benedettini (formerly sala VI 87).
Map

Date

Second half of 1st — end 2nd century CE (AD 50 – AD 200)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

The epitaph is fragmentary: Korhonen (2004: 243) suggested two possible formulae, the first with the name of the deceased in dative followed by [ἐ]ποίησ[εν υἱὸς ε]υσεβή[ς] (see also IG 14.527 = ISic001346), the second with the name of the dedicant in nominative and the dative of the deceased, not named (e.g. [ὁ δεῖνα ἐ]ποίησ[εν υἱῷ ε]ὐσεβ<ε>ῖ, [ὃς ἔ]ζησε ἔ[τη κτλ.]). The Korhonen rejects Kaibel’s reading ε]ὐσεβ[εστάτ because he reads a vertical stroke after Β, which could only have been an Η or a Ι. ε]ὐσεβ[ at l. 2 could also be not a form of the adjective but a proper name, such as Εὐσεβία or Εὐσέβιος (LGPN 3A: 176). However, since we are not sure how much space is missing on the left and right, it is also possible that the deceased had a different degree of kinship ([ὁ δεῖνα ἐ]ποίησ[εν συμβίῳ ε]ὐσεβῖ, see also IG 14.492 = ISic001314 or IG 14.495 = ISic001317).

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
10/31/2022