ISic001370: Epitaph for Tychemos

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic001370
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text based on photograph;
  • line.2: lapis: Τύχημος (i.e. Τύχιμος); Ferrua: Εὐτυχήμος (i.e. Εὐθυδήμος); Amico: Τύχηλλος
  • line.4: Kirchhoff: Ἰ[α]νυαρίων; Kaibel, Wessel, Korhonen: Ἰενυαρίων
  • lines.8-9: Wessel and Korhonen read two Christograms

Physical description

Support

Description
Marble plaque with rounded corners, set in plaster in modern times.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
complete, broken
Dimensions
height: 18.5 cmwidth: 21 cmdepth: 1-5 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Lines 1-9: 10-20mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not recordedmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Found in 1720 (1724 according to Muratori) “ante aream coenobii S. Mariae Annunciatae”.

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania , 271
Autopsy
Observed by Amico in Museo San Nicolò l’Arena, later by Korhonen in Magazzino del Cortile, Collezione dei Benedettini (formerly sala VI 79).
Map

Date

4th century CE (AD 301 – AD 400)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

This Christian epitaph does not present the ἐνθάδε κεῖται formula, but directly the date of death expressed by the aorist of τελευτάω and the age of the deceased with the participle ζήσας. This is followed by the indication of the purchase of the tomb (with the aorist of ἀγοράζω) by the deceased, for him and his descendants (ἠδίοις is an hypercorrection): for the reference to the descendants in pagan and Christian epitaphs in Catania, see IG 14.563 = ISic001382, SEG XVII 440 = ISic001628. On καλὸν βίον ζήσας/βιώσας, see also IGUR 2.626. The name of the deceased, Τύχημος (probably Τύχιμος), is not otherwise attested; Ferrua’s reading is palaeographically improbable (furthermore, Εὐτύχημος is not attested in imperial age, see BCH 45 (1921) p. 19 III, 101 from Kythera, 3rd cent. BCE), as well as Leclercq’s reading Τύχηλλος.

Note that the text has been badly overpainted in early modern times, leading to several misleading letter forms (e.g. initial epsilon as sigma)

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
12/22/2022