ISic001648: Epitaph for Theodoule (?)

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic001648
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text based on photograph and on Korhonen's edition;
  • line.1: Agnello: ἔν[θαδε κῖτε]
  • lines.1-2: Agnello: δούλη [τοῦ Θεοῦ]; Ferrua: [Θεο-]|δούλη [ζήσασα ἔτη κ]; Korhonen: [Θεο-]|δούλη [---]; also ἡ δούλη τοῦ [θεοῦ] (short name) is possible, such as in IG 14.549 = ISic001368
  • line.3: Ferrua 1982-83: [γεννηθεῖσα]; Ferrua 1989: τελευτᾶι [γεννηθεῖσα]; Korhonen: τελευτο[ῦσα ἐτῶν ---· ἐγεννήθη]
  • line.4: Ferrua 1938, Agnello, Korhonen: μὲν τῆι ὑπ(ατείαι) [Ἀυρηλιανοῦ Αὐγ(ούστου) τὸ β καὶ Κλαυδί-]|ου Καπιτω[λείνου τῶν λαμπ(ροτάτων); Ferrua 1982-83, 1989: μὲν τῆι ὑπ[ατίαι Κεσαρί]ου κ. Ἀττικοῦ
  • line.5: Agnello: [ἀποθανοῦσα δὲ]; Ferrua 1989: [κυμιθῖσα δὲ]; Korhonen: ἐτελεύτησε (?) δὲ (ἐκοιμήθη δὲ is also possible)
  • line.6: Orsi: Νω[εμβρίων]; Ferrua 1989: τῆι πρ(ὸ) ς Νων[ῶν Μαείων]
  • lines.7-8: Ferrua 1938: [με]τὰ τὴν ὑπα[τίαν Διοκλη]τια(νοῦ) κ. Κουσ[ταντίου τὸ β]; Agnello: [Διοκλη-]|τια(νοῦ) κ(αὶ) Κου[σταντίου; De Grassi (ap. Ferrua); Ferrua 1982-83, 1989, Korhonen: [με]τὰ τῆν ὑπα[τ. Ὁνωριου Αὐγ.] τὸ ια κ(αὶ) Κουσ[ταντίου τὸ β]

Physical description

Support

Description
Marble plaque damaged on the right, traces of reuse on the rear. The text is inside an engraved tabula ansata.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
fragment
Dimensions
height: 40 cmwidth: 37 cmdepth: 3.2 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Lines 1-8: 20-30mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not recordedmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Found in a cemetery close to the now-demolished Chiesa di San Clemente.

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania , 312
Autopsy
Observed by Orsi in Museo Civico, later by Korhonen in Magazzino del cortile, Museo Civico (formerly sala VI 123).
Map

Date

418 CE (Ferrua 1982-83, rejecting his earlier 274 CE suggestion) (AD 418 – AD 418)
Evidence
internal-date

Text type

funerary

commentary

The epitaph is extremely damaged, so the identification of the deceased is doubtful. According to Ferrua and Korhonen, the deceased is a woman named Theodoule, a frequent name in Christian inscriptions from Sicily and from Catania in particular (see also SEG 46.1261 = ISic001423 and Korhonen 2004: 80). Another possibility is to read at l. 2 δούλη [τοῦ θ(εο)ῦ, as Agnello did, and hypothesize a short name after the epithet as in IG 14.549 = ISic001368. Δοῦλος / δούλη τοῦ Θεοῦ is an epithet that frequently recurs in Christian inscriptions from Sicily, see e.g. ILipara 788 = ISic002833 and ILipara 789 = ISic002876.

Another problem is raised by the presence of a double date, which is indeed not uncommon in Christian inscriptions, see IG 14.525 = ISic000964. Ferrua in 1938 assumed a date of birth during the second consulate of Aurelian and Claudius Capitolinus (274 CE) and a date of death during the second consulate of Diocletianus and Constantius (297 CE). If accepted, this would be the oldest dated inscription in Sicily. If the first supplement at ll. 4-5 is quite convincing (at l. 5 Καπιτω is certain), the last supplement is more dubious, because of the unusual abbreviation of the name Διοκλη]τια(νοῦ) and the omission of the number of his consulate. Furthermore, the consular date, not typical in the paleo-Christian inscriptions, and the palaeography do not argue in favour of dating the inscription to the 3rd cent. CE. Therefore, Korhonen (whose text is adopted here) accepts the supplement at ll. 7-8 proposed by Ferrua himself later in 1982-83 and suggested to him already in 1938 by De Grassi, establishing the date of death of the deceased at the eleventh consulship of Honorius and the second of Constantius. However, the best supplement at ll. 4-5 still remains the one suggested by Ferrua in 1938, which sets the date of birth in 274 CE: the scholar, therefore, hypothesises an error by the stonecutter, who would have mistaken the date of birth of the deceased.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
12/22/2022