ISic002754: I.Sicily inscription 002754

Photo J. Prag, Aut. Assessorato Beni Culturali Regione Siciliana n.10681 del 06/05/2014
ID
ISic002754
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
oracle
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text after Manganaro 1992, but checked against the stone by autopsy (Prag);
  • line.19: The top of either a Φ or a Ψ is visible in approximately the fifth position of the line

Physical description

Support

Description
Five joining fragments of the upper part of a thick limestone slab, intact on the top, left and right, broken across the lower part, with damage to the lower right margin higher than on the left, beginning from line 6 of the text. The rear of the stone is finished also. Fragment A (upper left): max W 20.5 cm, max H. 19, D 6.9-8.1; fragment B (upper right): max W 17 cm, max H 18.5, D 7.3-8.5; fragment C (lower left): max W 14.5, max H 11.5, D 6.8-7.0; fragment D (lower middle): max W 3.5cm, max H 3, D (damaged) 3.5; fragment E (lower right) missing.
Object type
plaque
Material
limestone
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 27.5 cmwidth: 35 cmdepth: 8.5 cm

Inscription

Layout
The left margin of the text is carefully justified, but the right margin is very uneven, with several extensive vacats at line end.
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Line 1-19: 5-7mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not measured

Provenance

Place of origin
Acrae
Provenance found
Found by a local farmer in the area of Colle Orbo c.1968
Map

Current location

Place
Siracusa, Italy
Repository
Museo Archeologico Regionale Paolo Orsi , 66527
Autopsy
Depositi, Mag C, cass.113/04
Map

Date

2nd century BCE (200 BC – 1 BC)
Evidence
lettering

Text type

oracle

commentary

Of the five fragments, three are large (a, b, c) and two very small (d and e); the smallest (e), from the bottom edge of the join between the two principal fragments, is currently unlocated and not with the other fragments. The text should be considered alongside ISic003367; it was recovered together with that piece (although there is no evidence of how close the asssociation was). The letter forms are effectively identical on the two pieces, probably cut by the same hand.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
1/19/2021