ISic003006: Christian (?) epitaph

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic003006
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plaque
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

Text based on photographs; line.1: Manganaro: [ἐνθάδε κεῖνται]; Manganaro cautiously suggests the following integrations: [Εὐδαί]μων, Θεό[δουλος] or Θεό[κτιστος]
lines.1-2: Ferrua: Θεο|[δοσίου Αὐγ. τὸ β´] κὲ Μαξιμου λα[μπρ. ἀνδρὸς τὸ β´]

Physical description

Support

Description
Two joining fragments of marble, the second probably intact on the right.
Object type
plaque
Material
marble
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 37 cmwidth: 19 cmdepth: 13 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Lines 1-2: 35-40mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: not recordedmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Catina
Provenance found
Discovered in the necropolis of via Dottor Consoli

Current location

Place
Catania, Italy
Repository
Museo Civico di Catania
Autopsy
Observed by Manganaro in the courtyard of Castello Ursino
Map

Date

5th century (Manganaro; Ferrua restores with consular date of 388 CE) (AD 401 – AD 500)
Evidence
No data

Text type

funerary

commentary

This is probably a Christian epitaph, whose only complete name, Μαξιμοῦλα, is nevertheless problematic: it could be a variant of the most frequent name Μαξιμίλλα (e.g. IG 14, no. 872) or the Greek translation of the Latin Maximula, attested CIL 8, no. 993 l. 1 (see Kajanto 1965: 276). Manganaro suggests an integration for the first name at l. 1 [Εὐδαί]μων, for the second at ll. 1-2 Θεό[δουλος] or Θεό[κτιστος]. Especially Θεόδουλος is frequently attested in the onomastics of the ancient Christians of Catania (see Korhonen 2004: 80): for Θεόδουλος see IMusCatania 183 l. 4 = ISic001361, IG 14, no. 538 l. 3 = ISic001357.

Ferrua interprets the inscription differently and suggests the following integration at ll. 1-2 Θεο|[δοσίου Αὐγ. τὸ β´] κὲ Μαξιμου λα[μπρ. ἀνδρὸς τὸ β´]. The inscription would mention the consuls for the year 388 CE, Theodosius, the Eastern Roman emperor, and not Flavius Merobaudes, the other consul in that year, but Maximus, who usurped the Western throne. According to Ferrua (1982-1983: 8), he was mentioned in the inscription "in una specie di compromesso" as a private man (λαμπρὸς ἀνήρ and not Αὔγουστος). The dating would therefore be the first part of the year (January/February?) of 388 CE since Maximus died in August of that year. Nevertheless, Ferrua’s integration seems arbitrary, since the fragment seems intact on the right.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions
Discussion

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
9/21/2021