ISic004416: Epitaph for Philon, son Aunakos

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic004416
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
funerary
Object type
plinth
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • text based upon photographs;
  • line.1: Sofia 2018: Φιλ.ν.[.].....

Physical description

Support

Description
Plinth (support for a stele) with mouldings top and bottom, of the local sandstone; the upper moulding is damaged, principally at the corners. The plinth is the right one of a pair mounted on a single base, classified as an epitymbion of type C.
Object type
plinth
Material
sandstone
Condition
No data
Dimensions
height: 33 cmwidth: 60 cmdepth: 71 cm

Inscription

Layout
Single line of greek letters approximately centred on the face of the plinth, descending to right
Text condition
No data
Lettering

Letter heights
Line 1: 59mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: NAmm

Provenance

Place of origin
Abacaenum
Provenance found
Tomb 69/70 of the necropolis in contrada Cardusa, where it remains in situ
Map

Current location

Place
Tripi, Italy
Repository
Necropoli di Abakainon ,
Autopsy
Metcalfe 2016 visited site
Map

Date

The tomb has not been excavated fully, but the cemetery went out of use around the end of the 3rd century BCE or early 2nd century, offering a terminus ante quem (350 BC – 200 BC)
Evidence
archaeological-context

Text type

funerary

commentary

The name Φίλων is extremely common; Αυνακος on the other hand is only attested on the other plinth of this tomb, ISic004415. This plinth is one of a pair on a single base - a type attested several times in this necropolis - and the second plinth (ISic004415) is also inscribed and the presence of the name Αυνακος in the genitive as its second element there suggests that the tomb is a double one for siblings. The same situation seems to be attested in the case of ISic004417 / ISic004418. The first name here appears to be in the nominative (which has a parallel in ISic001208), rather than the more commonly found genitive in this necropolis. The lettering of this text is both larger and cruder than on the companion text, and less carefully set out, suggesting a different hand.

Bibliography

Digital editions
  • TM: -
  • EDR: -
  • EDH: -
  • EDCS: -
  • PHI: -
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
1/19/2021