ISic020769: ISic020769
This inscription is deprecated. Valentina Mignosa deprecated the file in favour of ISic020558 as this text appeared to be a different inscription due to the difference in the reading of the ductus of alpha (see Arena IGASM 2, 92, fig. 27.3; Agostiniani 2018, p. 183-184, fig. 89) but it is actually the same document (see commentary in ISic020558). View inscription ISic020558
- ID
- ISic020769
- Language
- Ancient Greek
- Text type
- abecedarium
- Object type
- cup
- Status
- No data
- Links
- View in current site
Edition
Apparatus criticus
- Text after Agostiniani, in Agostiniani, Albanese Procelli 2018.
Physical description
Support
- Description
- Cup, fragment of the wall.
- Object type
- cup
- Material
- ceramic
- Condition
- fragment
- Dimensions
- height: cm, dim: , width: cm, depth: cm
Inscription
- Layout
- The text is placed on the outer surface of the fragment.
- Text condition
- incomplete
- Letter heights
- Line 1: mm
- Interlinear heights
Provenance
- Place of origin
- Herbessus (?)
- Provenance found
- Found during the excavations (Soprintendenza alle Antichità di Siracusa, 1966—1968) in the area of the archaic necropolis, grave 113.
- Map
Current location
- Place
- Agrigento, Italy
- Repository
- Museo Regionale Archeologico Pietro Griffo ,
- Autopsy
- None
- Map
Date
500—450 BCE (500 BC – 450 BC)- Evidence
- archaeological-context, material-context, lettering
Text type
commentary
This is clearly a beginning of an alphabetarium. Interestingly, the ductus of the letters is different from what we see in the other texts: the arrow-shaped alpha is of the type with a bar attached to the vertex of the letter; the gamma is of the type with a single bar, perhaps slightly curved; the delta is of the type found in Montagna di Marzo, but with a dot in its centre. Clearly, the reason for this difference is to be found in the particular nature of the text, the alphabetarium, which presents the 'model' types of the local alphabet. It should also be noted that, without the possibility of tracing the archaeological context in this case, it is difficult to date the document on a palaeographic basis, due to the reasons mentioned above.
Bibliography
- Digital editions
- TM: -
- EDR: -
- EDH: -
- EDCS: -
- PHI: -
- Printed editions
- Discussion
Citation and editorial status
- Editor
- Jonathan Prag
- Principal contributor
- Valentina Mignosa
- Contributors
- Jonathan Prag
- Valentina Mignosa
- James Chartrand
- Michael Metcalfe
- system
- Simona Stoyanova
- Last revision
- 12/21/2022