ISic030298: Entella 5 = A1, Entella thanks those who helped in the synoikismos

Image courtesy of the Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents, Faculty of Classics, University of Oxford
ID
ISic030298
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
decree
Object type
lamina
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text by Prag based upon photographs;
  • 3: Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89, Nenci 91: Γναί<ου>ου (after Lejeune, ASNP 1982, p.792-94; contra Daux 84, p.393)
  • 4: Lewis 78: °ππίου · Πανάμουο; Nenci 80: ἱππίου · Πανάμου; Asheri-Nenci 82 app.crit.: (wrongly) ascribes reading Ἱππίου to Anglicus interpres
  • 13: other edd.: πόλιος; SEG 30: πο- omitted
  • 14: Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30: κατ ἅπαντος
  • 15: other edd.: κατακαλεῖσθαι ἐς τ[ο]ὺς
  • 16: Lewis 78: ἐξι.ατ.ήσαντας (transl: ‘assisted? (word undeciphered)’); Nenci 80: ἐξ̣̣ι.ατ.ήσανταν; SEG 30: ἐξι.ατ.ήσαντας; Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89, Nenci 91, Nenci 93: ἐξυ[πηρε]τήσαντας; Lombardo 97, p.1039: ἐπ̣ι̣β̣ο̣α̣θ̣ο̣ήσαντας; Porciani 01: ἐξυ̣[πηρε]τ̣ή̣σαντας; Ampolo et al. 2001, Souza 24: ἐσβ̣ο̣αθ̣ο̣ήσαντας
  • 17: Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89: ικισμ[ὸ]ν; Nenci 91, Nenci 93: ικισμὸ̣ν
  • 18: Dubois 89: -λίων
  • 19: Variant form of the numerals in Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89; significant variation Lombardo 97, p.1042
  • 20: Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89, Nenci 91, Nenci 93: τ[ὸ]; slightly variant form of the second numeral in Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89
  • 21: Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89: Ταυ̣α̣ι̣σχεηνων; Manganaro 90, p.400 n.41: τῶ̣ν̣ δ̣ὲ̣ Σχερ̣ί̣νων (after Bejor, ASNP 1982, p.834); Nenci 91, 93: τᾶμ Σχηρίνων; Lombardo 97, p.1040-42: ἡπτα (num) Σχερίνων (misreported by SEG 47.1419); BE 106 (1993), 717 (Dubois): Ταμσχεήνων; the numeral also varies across these readings
  • 22: Nenci 91, Nenci 93: χριθᾶν
  • 23: Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Nenci 91: numeral as H; Asheri-Nenci 82, Nenci 93: numeral omitted (Nenci 83, p.1001 states omitted in error, H to be read; cf. SEG 32, 914); Dubois 89: H with double bar; Lombardo 97, p.1043: aporia; Porciani 01: [.]
  • 24: Porciani 01: Θεώδωρος
  • 25: Lewis 78: Αἰσχύλ[ο]ς; Nenci 80, SEG 30: Αἰσχύ[ο]ς; Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89, Daux 84, p.393: Αἰσχύ[λο]ς; Asheri-Nenci 82, app.crit. reports: ‘Αἰσχύ]ο[ς Angl. interp.’; Porciano 01, Souza 24: Αἰσχυλὶς; Slightly variant form of third numeral in SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89
  • 26: Slightly variant form of the numerals in Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89
  • 27: Slightly variant form of the numeral in Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89; Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89, Nenci 91, Nenci 93: Κορ<ό>ουιος (after Lejeune, ASNP 1982, p.792-94)
  • 28: Slightly variant form of the second numeral in Nenci 91, Nenci 93
  • 29: Lewis 78, Nenci 80, SEG 30, Asheri-Nenci 82, Dubois 89, Nenci 91, Nenci 93: ἐσγράψαντες (corrected by Lombardo 97, p.1040).

Physical description

Support

Description
Bronze tablet, no measurements; rectangular with triangular pediment; border attached by nails on all sides except base; an additional strip divides the pediment from the rectangular body; 3 nail holes, at top middle, bottom right, bottom left.
Object type
lamina
Material
bronze
Condition
complete
Dimensions
height: cmwidth: cmdepth: cm

Inscription

Layout
Lines 1-5 are roughly centred in the tympanon of the tablet. From line 6, the text is sited on the main rectangular body of the tablet. The left hand margin is ‘justified’, the right not. Line 15 exceeds the left hand margin by one letter space; the implication of both the position of the initial kappa and its form would seem to be that the engraver initially omitted it.
Text condition
complete
Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation: not measured

Provenance

Place of origin
Entella
Provenance found
The tablet is one of 8 illegally looted from the site of Rocca d'Entella, almost certainly in the spring of 1977 from a location in close proximity to the more recently excavated area in the centre of the ancient city in the 'eastern valley'. For the fullest discussion, see Ampolo 2021, esp. 91-93. Ampolo, Magnetto and Porciani 2001 demonstrate that the 8 tablets were preserved for an extended period in a single location, superimposed upon one another, probably in a container (a stone theka?), and were most likely found together also. Although reported, investigated, and published multiple times, the tablet remains unrecovered and in private hands.
Map

Current location

Place
,
Repository
Unknown private location ,
Autopsy
none

Date

First Punic War (264-241 BCE), and commonly attributed to the second half of the war. (264 BC – 241 BC)
Evidence
lettering, textual-context

Text type

decree

commentary

The text of Lewis was at least partially based upon photographs taken pre-cleaning; and the initial texts of Nenci / Nenci and Asheri were derivative of Lewis' original transcription. The bibliography is intended to cover principal editions only. For a recent historical discussion, elucidating the First Punic War context, see Lombardo, Mario. 2018. «Entella tra i Cartaginesi e i Romani, ovvero da chi erano stati espulsi gli Entellini». In Munus Laetitiae. Studi miscellanei offerti a Maria Letizia Lazzarini, a cura di Francesco Camia, Lavinio Del Monaco, e Michela Nocita, 2:485–98. Rome: Sapienza Universita Editrice. https://doi.org/10.13133/9788893770736; and now Souza 2024.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions
Discussion

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
3/15/2025