ISic000088: Fragmentary imperial dedication

ID
ISic000088
Language
Latin
Text type
dedication
Object type
altar
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text after Gualtherus and Manganaro;
  • 2: Mommsen: imp(eratori) Cae[sari]
  • 3: Gualtherus prints I... at the end of line 3 of frag. 1 and IVL. at the start of the second fragment, united by Mommsen and Manganaro; Manganaro: Liv[iae deae]

Physical description

Support

Description
Two fragments of a stone altar, but no details preserved.
Object type
altar
Material
stone
Condition
fragments
Dimensions
height: cm, width: cm, depth: cm

Inscription

Layout
It is unclear exactly what the relationship of the two fragments to one another was.
Text condition
incomplete
Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Thermae Himeraeae
Provenance found
Observed by Gualtherus (1624) inside the town-hall of Termini, broken and one of the two parts already missing. Not seen since.

Current location

Lost.

Date

Post-4 CE, date of Tiberius' adoption (AD 4 – AD 14)
Evidence
prosopography

Text type

dedication

commentary

Gualtherus reports the text as being in two fragments, of which the second was already lost. Neither Mommsen nor Manganaro in their proposed restoration and unification of the fragments really make clear how they get from ARA / IMP.CAE.. / ET . I... and IVL. / MATRI. / IMP. CAE. to the restoration of Livia in line 3, although Mommsen's sketch suggests what is proposed here, namely that I... and IVL. need to be understood as a garbled reading of LIVIAE across the break and the transcription of the lost fragment. As Torremuzza observed, it would theoretically be possible instead to refer this e.g. to Caracalla and Iulia Severa.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
7/25/2024