ISic000539: Fragment of Latin inscription on a marble arch

No image available

ID
ISic000539
Language
Latin
Text type
dedication
Object type
arch
Status
draft
Links
View in current site

Edition

T. Mommsen, Inscriptiones Bruttiorum Lucaniae Campaniae Siciliae Sardiniae Latinae. Pars posterior. Inscriptiones Siciliae et Sardiniae, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, consilio et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Regiae Borussicae editum, 10.2 (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1883) Zotero
Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text of CIL, after Gualtherus and Cordici ;
  • 1: Gualtherus: FIR omitted, lacuna marked; FIR recorded by Ventimiglia (so Mommsen); Cordici: I·PCC, later deleted
  • 2: Cordici: EFFE·INPEN, later deleted

Physical description

Support

Description
Described by Gualtherus as 'in fornice marmoreo', but the scale / nature of the arch is entirely unclear and no further description is provided.
Object type
arch
Material
marble
Object condition
No data
Dimensions
height: cmwidth: cmdepth: cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Technique
chiselled
Pigment
No data
Lettering
No data
Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Eryx
Provenance found
Recorded by Gualtherus as 'apud Vinc. Maiorem'; also recorded in the manuscript of Antonio Cordici, and said there to come from contrada della Piscina Apolline, and subsequently in Cordici's possession.

Current location

Lost

Date

Imperial - possibly to be identified with the proconsul L. Seius on Augustan coinage of Panormus (AD 1 - AD 100)
Evidence
prosopography

Text type

dedication

commentary

Manganaro and Mommsen both noted that the name L.Seius also appears on coins of Panhormus as proconsul of Sicily, in the late Augustan period, and identification with the L. Seius here, making a dedication at Erice, would be attractive, but far from certain. The consul of 18 CE seems less likely, as his cognomen Tubero does not seem to align with the traces variously recorded at the end of line 1 in the antiquarian tradition. P.PEC might be p(osuit) pec(unia).

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
12/4/2025