ISic001174: Cadastral inscription for the territory of Halaesa

I.Sicily with the permission of the Assessorato Regionale dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana - Dipartimento dei Beni Culturali e dell’Identità Siciliana
ID
ISic001174
Language
Ancient Greek
Text type
cadastral
Object type
stele
Status
No data
Links
View in current site

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • frA: Text of IG XIV.352
  • frB: Text of SEG 4.45
  • frC: Text of Arena 2020: 5 no. 1 (cf. Arena 2018)
  • frC-4: Arena: ὁδοῦ τᾶ[ς---], but traces of final Σ clear in photo and drawing.
  • frD: Text of Arena 2020: 15 no. 2 (cf. Arena 2018)

Physical description

Support

Description
A monumental inscription on at least two large 'tabulae', presumably free-standing stelae; fragments both lost and preserved are recorded of at least two.
Object type
stele
Material
limestone
Condition
fragments, non-contiguous
Dimensions
height: 95 cm, width: 7 cm, depth: 61 cm

Inscription

Layout
No data
Text condition
No data
Letter heights
Line 1: mm
Interlinear heights
Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Halaesa
Provenance found
The principal fragment A was found in the area of the church of Santa Maria dei Palazzi, on the site of Halaesa, in 1558.; fragment C was found 2007-03-07 in a dry stone wall (USM 1065) in land to the south-east of the Church of S. Maria dei Palazzi, between insulae III and IV, west of the 'cardo maximus'; fragment D was a casual find, precise data and location not recorded, within the archaeological site of Halaesa.
Map

Current location

Lost.

Date

2nd — 1st century BCE (Kaibel simply 'post-Roman conquest'; Calderone argues 2nd — 1st on letter forms etc. of his frag.; but, 1998, for c. 300 BCE, which Nenci too believes; Manganaro 2nd century BCE). (200 BC – 1 BC)
Evidence
No data

Text type

cadastral

commentary

(Note that the translation of Fragment A is based upon the text of Dubois, IGDS no.196.)

The main fragment A, is long-since lost, in the course of the 17th century; the second fragment, B, found in 1885 and published the same year by Di Giovanni is also now lost. Two further fragments, sporadic finds on the site of Halaesa (fragment c in 2007, fragment d undated), were published in 2020 by Arena. The original reports of discovery of the principal fragment reference the existence of a second very mutilated and damaged stele that was therefore not recovered or recorded further. It is most commonly reckoned that Fragment B probably derives from this second stele. Arena argues cogently that fragments C and D belong to this text, and explores the possible hypotheses regarding whether they should be associated with the first stele / fragment A, or with the second and fragment B, concluding with a speculative integration of fragment C into the right hand side of column 2 of fragment B. Fragment D is too small to warrant such speculation.

A further substantial fragment (ISic003651) of similar type, but slightly divergent content was published by Calderone in 1961, and is generally considered to belong to a separate but probably associated text. Arena 2020 offers the most detailed consideration of the relationship, concluding that the stone and text are distinct, but belong within the same socio-economic and political context and is most likely associated to, if separate from, the cadastral text itself.

Bibliography

Digital editions
Printed editions
Discussion

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
11/23/2021